Unfilled job orders. Candidates who accept and then don't start. Temp payroll invoiced weeks after workers are paid. And compliance gaps under Agency Workers Regulations that most consultants have never read. Find out exactly where your agency is losing money.
The recruitment model creates multiple failure points between taking a job order and banking a fee. These figures show how much falls through the gaps.
These are not recruitment problems — they are operational problems. Every one is measurable, and every one has a fix.
Every unfilled job order represents a fee you were authorised to earn but didn't. In permanent recruitment, an average placement rate of 25–35% of exclusive job orders is common but rarely examined critically. On an agency taking 60 perm job orders per quarter at an average fee of £4,000, a placement rate of 25% versus a benchmark of 35% is 6 placements — £24,000 of fee income per quarter, £96,000 per year — lost to a gap that is almost always attributable to process: speed to shortlist, quality of qualification, depth of candidate pipeline, and follow-up on stalled searches.
Estimated annual revenue gap: £40,000–£120,000 depending on volume and fee level
A placed candidate who accepts an offer and then does not start represents a wasted search, a broken client relationship, and — in retained or partially paid arrangements — a fee that must be reworked. Drop-off rates of 15–25% between acceptance and start date are normal in high-demand sectors, but the causes are almost always addressable: lack of candidate engagement post-offer, no counter-offer management process, poor expectation-setting at the interview stage, and no regular contact between acceptance and induction day. A structured post-offer process consistently reduces drop-off by 30–40%.
Estimated annual fee leakage: £15,000–£50,000
In a well-run recruitment agency, consultant activity ratios are tracked weekly: calls made, interviews arranged, CVs sent, offers made, placements confirmed. When these ratios are not tracked, consultant productivity varies enormously — and the top performers cross-subsidise the middle. On a desk generating £120,000 per year at benchmark, a 20% activity shortfall means £24,000 of potential fee income that should have been earned. Agencies that introduce weekly activity dashboards typically see desk revenue increase by 12–18% within the first quarter without adding headcount.
Estimated annual lost revenue per underperforming consultant: £15,000–£30,000
Temp recruitment creates one of the most challenging cash flow structures of any SME: workers are paid weekly, clients are invoiced monthly with 30-day terms — creating a 45–60 day gap between cash out and cash in on every temp booking. Agencies that do not have a formal credit control process on temp billing — automated reminders, escalation triggers, credit limit management — consistently run debtor days of 50–70 days and accumulate slow payers who have become habitual. Every extra day of debtor time on a £50,000 monthly temp payroll costs approximately £20 in working capital finance cost.
Estimated annual finance cost of slow temp debtors: £5,000–£20,000
The recruitment market is a speed game. When time-to-fill runs above sector benchmark — typically 20–30 days for most perm roles — clients go to another agency, candidates go cold, and the fee is lost. Time-to-fill is almost never tracked at desk level in smaller agencies. The causes are usually process: slow initial qualification of job briefs, unstructured shortlist production, no standard for interview feedback turnaround, and offers delayed by internal approvals. Time-to-fill reduction of 20% is consistently achievable through process standardisation alone, without additional headcount.
Estimated annual impact on client retention and repeat fees: £10,000–£35,000
The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 entitle temporary workers to the same basic pay and working conditions as equivalent permanent employees after 12 continuous weeks in the same role with the same hirer. Failure to apply AWR correctly — particularly around pay parity, holiday entitlement, and access to facilities — exposes the agency to employment tribunal claims from individual workers and to client indemnity claims where the agency warranted compliance. AWR claims carry no cap on compensation where basic pay discrimination is demonstrated. Many SME agencies have AWR policies that were written in 2011 and have not been reviewed since.
Employment tribunal risk — no compensation cap where pay parity breach is demonstrated
The Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003 set out specific obligations around written terms of business, notification to hirers, and the handling of candidate information. Separately, holding CV databases of thousands of candidates creates significant GDPR obligations around consent, retention periods, and the right to erasure. The ICO has issued fines to recruitment businesses for CV database GDPR breaches. The combination of Conduct Regulations non-compliance and GDPR exposure creates a regulatory risk profile that most SME agencies have never formally assessed.
ICO fine risk up to £17.5m or 4% of global turnover — flagged as Pillar 10 Red where gaps are found
Recruitment is a high-revenue, high-activity business where the operational gaps are not always visible on the P&L. Revenue looks good. GP looks acceptable. But placement rate, consultant productivity, debtor days, and compliance exposure tell a different story when they are measured against benchmark. The Diagnostic Assessment looks at all 10 pillars and applies them directly to your agency model.
On Pillar 3 (Sales and Conversion), we model your placement rate against the job orders taken and calculate the fee revenue that should have been earned at benchmark conversion. On Pillar 8 (Cash Flow and Debtor Management), we calculate your actual debtor days on temp payroll and identify the specific client accounts creating the cash flow gap. On Pillar 10 (Risk and Compliance), we review your AWR procedures, your Conduct Regulations compliance, and whether your candidate database GDPR position has been formally reviewed — flagging specific gaps as Red where exposure exists. The report gives you the exact numbers, not general commentary.
The Guarantee
"If after reading your report you don't feel you've received at least £599 of genuine, specific insight into your business — email us within 7 days for a full refund. No forms, no questions, no awkward conversations."
Every month you don't know where your operation is leaking, it keeps leaking. At the average SME rate, that's around £3,000 a month. The assessment costs £599.
Book My Diagnostic Assessment — £599Or download the free Recruitment Agency Hidden Costs report → Download here