The average SME manufacturer runs equipment at 55–60% Overall Equipment Effectiveness. World class is 85%. Every percentage point below benchmark is lost output you've already paid for. And that's before scrap, rework and scheduling delays are calculated.
UK SME manufacturers face margin pressure from all directions. Most of the leakage is internal — and quantifiable.
These are the specific operational losses that compound quietly in manufacturing businesses. Most owners know something is wrong. Few have quantified it.
Overall Equipment Effectiveness measures three things: whether your equipment is running when it should be (availability), whether it's running at rated speed when it is running (performance), and whether the output is good first time (quality). At 60% OEE against an 85% world-class benchmark, you're running at 70% of what the same machines in a well-run operation produce. On a floor with £800,000 of direct labour and overhead costs, that 25-point OEE gap represents roughly £200,000 of capacity you're paying for but not using. You don't need new machines — you need to use the ones you have more effectively.
Typical annual cost: £25,000–£90,000 depending on floor size, direct cost base and actual OEE gap
Scrap and rework are the most visible form of manufacturing waste and also the most accepted. "That's just our reject rate" is one of the most expensive sentences in a small manufacturer's vocabulary. At a 3% scrap and rework rate on £1.2m revenue, you're spending £36,000 per year on material, labour and machine time that produces nothing saleable. The root cause is almost always a combination of incoming material quality, process variation and inadequate first-off inspection — all of which can be reduced significantly with defined process parameters and formal first-article inspection procedures.
Typical annual cost: £18,000–£55,000 in direct scrap and rework cost for a £750k–£2m revenue manufacturer
Work in progress sitting on the shop floor between operations is money that has been spent but not yet invoiced. Every hour a partially-completed job sits idle between two operations is an hour of lead time added, a customer delivery promise at risk, and capital tied up that could be turning. Most SME manufacturers schedule by individual order rather than by constraint — the result is a floor full of WIP, a bottleneck operation that's always the problem, and a lead time that keeps creeping. Theory of Constraints identifies the bottleneck in a morning. Building a schedule around it typically reduces lead time by 20–35% within 90 days.
Typical annual cost: £12,000–£35,000 in extended lead time, missed delivery penalties and WIP carrying cost
In most SME manufacturing operations, direct labour is the largest single cost — typically 25–35% of cost of sales. The difference between hours paid and hours spent on direct productive work is your utilisation rate. Waiting for materials, searching for tooling, attending to machine faults that should have been prevented, attending informal meetings and covering for absent colleagues all subtract from productive time. At 75% direct utilisation on a £350,000 annual direct labour bill, you're paying for 87,500 hours but getting 65,600 hours of productive work — the gap is £87,500 per year.
Typical annual cost: £15,000–£45,000 in non-productive direct labour on a 10–25 person shop floor
When a key material or component arrives late, everything downstream stops or shifts. The cost is not just the delay — it's the schedule change, the expediting cost, the overtime to catch up, and the customer relationship damage when delivery is missed. Most SME manufacturers accept supplier lead time variability as a fact of life. The fix is a formal supplier performance review — measuring on-time delivery, quantity accuracy and quality conformance — which creates the data to negotiate improved performance or trigger a sourcing change. Suppliers who know they're measured perform better.
Typical annual cost: £8,000–£25,000 in production disruption, expediting and overtime caused by supplier variability
Manufacturing environments carry the highest H&S risk profile of any SME category. The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 require a written H&S policy for businesses employing 5 or more people, formal risk assessments for all significant hazards, and records of all accidents and near-misses. HSE inspections of manufacturing premises regularly identify missing or out-of-date risk assessments, COSHH assessments for chemicals in use, and inadequate records of machinery guarding checks. Improvement notices, prohibition notices and prosecutions all carry financial penalties — and a workplace accident without adequate documentation creates catastrophic liability.
Regulatory exposure: improvement notices, prohibition notices, HSE prosecution fines up to unlimited — plus employer liability claims where documentation is inadequate ⚠ Compliance Risk
Many small manufacturers supply customers who require ISO 9001 certification, or who have their own supplier quality requirements that reference ISO standards. Maintaining certification or customer-mandated quality systems requires documented procedures, controlled non-conformance records, calibration records for measuring equipment, and management review processes. Where these records are incomplete or informal, the risk is a customer audit failure, loss of approved supplier status, or certification withdrawal — all of which can trigger immediate loss of contract revenue that far exceeds the cost of getting the documentation right.
Business risk: loss of approved supplier status and contract revenue for customers requiring ISO 9001 or equivalent quality documentation ⚠ Compliance Risk
The 10-pillar assessment is structured around the metrics that actually determine profitability in manufacturing. Pillar 1 — Financial Health — calculates your gross margin as a percentage of revenue, benchmarks your labour cost as a percentage of cost of sales against Make UK sector averages for your manufacturing category, and models what your margin would be if your direct cost ratios matched the top-quartile operator in your sector. For most manufacturers we assess, that gap is worth £20,000–£60,000 annually.
Pillar 4 — Operations and Scheduling — examines your production planning process: how jobs are loaded onto the floor, how WIP is tracked, how the schedule responds to disruption, and whether your bottleneck operation is formally managed. This pillar produces an estimated lead time reduction and an OEE gap calculation that puts a £ figure on the capacity you're already paying for but not capturing.
Pillar 10 — Risk and Compliance — specifically covers your H&S documentation (policy, risk assessments, COSHH, accident records), your quality management documentation relative to any ISO or customer requirements, and your employer liability records. Manufacturing is the highest-risk sector for HSE enforcement activity — the assessment flags every gap with a priority rating so you know exactly what needs addressing first.
The Guarantee
"If after reading your report you don't feel you've received at least £599 of genuine, specific insight into your business — email us within 7 days for a full refund. No forms, no questions, no awkward conversations."
Every month you don't know where your operation is leaking, it keeps leaking. At the average SME rate, that's around £3,000 a month. The assessment costs £599.
Book My Assessment — £599Or download the free Manufacturing Hidden Costs report → Download here